At b5media, we are weighing how we want to respond to this. Either we give in to Google and let them dictate what we do and have the unenviable position of losing pagerank and possibly advertising dollars, or we take the stand that quality content is quality content regardless of Google and that our content will speak for itself. We still produce millions of pages of content per month. We still have respect in the community. We still have advertisers recognizing that these sites are valuable assets to leverage to get their campaigns out on. [Technosailor]
Aaron presents the content is king argument, which is how it was during the times of print and which I assume will always be the case in any forms of publishing. But as PR drops, its almost similar to saying that “oh our magazine lost its prime space in the magazine stand and third party surveys are saying that we’re only doing so and so circulation – when in fact, we’re doing so much more.”
I’m not sure how this affects smaller and more niche publishing networks like our very own Bayanihan Blog Network here in the Philippines. Maybe they aren’t affected as the Google PR algorithm only directly affects high caliber sites like ProBlogger and other PR 6 and 7 sites.
Does this mean, therefore, that if I had an independent PR 6 site, joining a blog network to expand my reach would result in an incremental traffic boost but a sacrifice in PageRank. This would be a bad move as this would directly affect my fixed TLA earnings.
Should blog networks rely on AdSense and TLA on the long term? I guess not. Direct advertising seems, and from history, will always be the way to go?